If you still look at Amazon Inc. (AMZN) as just an Internet retailing giant, you’re not just missing the point – you are also missing one of the really great long-term profit plays in the market today.

Amazon remains the proverbial 800-pound gorilla in the online retailing space. And business is both healthy and growing. But the company is counting on a whole new series of technology-based ventures that will provide the real fuel that will put this stock into orbit. Let’s take a closer look.

Just last Thursday, in yet another positive “surprise” that Wall Street missed predicting, Amazon annihilated analysts’ earnings estimates by announcing a big jump in fourth-quarter profits and told investors even better days are ahead.

Fourth-Quarter Fireworks

In a financial-crisis environment in which there is supposedly no financing available, in which massive job cuts and huge job worries are causing consumers to cut way back on their spending, in which all retailers – even vaunted discounter Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (NYSE: WMT) – face huge challenges, Amazon actually increased its sales and profits.

In fact, Amazon’s fourth-quarter net income rose a hefty 9%. And not only did its per-share earnings of 52 cents blast through the Wall Street consensus of 39 cents by a full 33%, the company actually boosted its first-quarter outlook, stating that it expected sales to be stronger than analysts were predicting.

For the fourth quarter, Amazon’s sales advanced 18%, beating analysts’ expectations by about 4%. Sales actually would have grown by 24%, were it not for the strengthening of the U.S. dollar.

International sales were even stronger, and now account for a full 45% of Amazon’s overall sales.  One notable category was electronics and general merchandize advanced 31%, and that category now accounts for 43% of worldwide sales. 

One particularly noteworthy achievement was in the area of gross margins, which suffered almost no damage – in spite of a U.S. recession that’s forcing most retailers to discount heavily. Amazon’s gross margins barely budged, dropping from a fairly remarkable 20.6% to a still-enviable 20.1%. 

Remember, this outlook and performance is taking place in a market environment where there’s very little “visibility” – meaning company executives have almost no ability to predict what the market will look like next month, let alone in the next quarter or for next year. That’s forced a lot of companies to discount heavily, and is a key reason that a large number of firms have stopped issuing “forward guidance.”

But not Amazon: It continues to provide guidance – and then to exceed those expectations.

How is the company making this happen? These results point to strong market-share gains for Amazon and to new lines of business being introduced, which are powering the stock higher.  But, before we go deeper into Amazon, let’s consider the economic backdrop, in order to fully appreciate magnitude of Amazon’s accomplishments.

Anatomy of a Meltdown

In my 25-year investment career, I have seen countrywide market meltdowns like the one we’re struggling through perhaps every two or three years.  The hallmark of these crises has been an implosion of the banking system, which has then brought the entire economy down, as well.

In an effort to provide some context – and perhaps some reassurance to U.S. investors – let me say that I’ve seen much worse than what we are seeing in the United States right now. For instance, there are actually cases where all of a country’s banking deposits are either frozen (Argentina 2002) or lost outright (Russia 1998).

In each of those cases, there were two constants:

• From a business standpoint, the strong got stronger as their weaker rivals foundered and failed, allowing them to pick up market share and sometimes to even buy those smaller or weaker rivals.
• From a stock-market-valuation standpoint, however, the strong were initially equally punished in terms of their market valuations as the broader equity markets blew up, meaning their valuations didn’t reflect the much-brighter outlooks for them as stronger market leaders. However, when the market outlook brightened, those stronger firms saw their valuations surge with a vengeance and soar to new heights.

The lesson from each of those crises – from Brazil and Argentina, to more than 10 countries in Asia and in Russia – was that every single country made it back.
This was even true for those countries shackled with inferior policy mixes.  Some might say that Japan – with its “lost decade” – never came back.  This would be an imprecise statement, since Japan’s gross domestic product (GDP) growth was above 2.0% for the two years prior to the crisis and unemployment for the last five years has been between 3.45 % and 4.5%
But what is true is that while even countries with inferior policy mixes eventually made it back, it took a lot longer for that to happen. The speed of their comebacks can be traced to the degree in which the policies implemented made them:

• Open-market oriented, especially with regards to foreign capital.
• A lower-taxation environment.
• Strongly fiscally disciplined – for the long term – because the governing body addressed such serious structural economic problems as imbalances in both the social security and health-care systems.
• Less constricted by regulation.
• More transparent, in both the private and public sectors, especially in cases where the public sector overhauls led to a more democratic governing process.
• More-consensus oriented, particularly when that consensus included support for all the changes I’ve listed here.

While we are not seeing an unequivocal embrace of these tried-and-true recipes by the newly installed Barack Obama administration, mainly because of a bias toward big government, we are seeing an open-minded attitude and some movement in this direction.  And we will have to monitor this closely, because history shows us repeatedly that there are no half measures when it comes to successful economic and financial reform – and because market investors know this and will therefore be watching closely.

Forewarned is Forearmed …and Other Axioms to Live By

This background is important, for we now know that we can expect to see some once-in-a-generation buying opportunities in companies that can navigate this slowdown and position themselves for a massive subsequent rebound.

We also have to remember that his rebound won’t be immediate. But when it does come, that rebound will be huge for the companies that have used this time to buttress their already-leading market position. They’ve capitalized on consolidations in their respective industries or market sectors, and have certainly grabbed market share away from their rivals. The maximum gains will be realized only if financial prudence prevails in the public sector.

Is that happening here in the U.S. market?

Well, we’re about to pass a huge stimulus – perhaps as much as $1 trillion or more, when all is said and done.

There’s an old axiom about government stimulus packages: When money is spent, the economy grows. The key, however, is at what cost and who pays for it. So the short-term “steroids” effect of the stimulus has to be measured against the long-term weight its costs will exert of future growth.  But, ahead of that steroids injection, investors need to invest in the beneficiaries.
A much-repeated market axiom states that  “no one buys at the bottom, and no one sells at the top.” Much like no one was – or will be – ringing a warning bell at the market bottom, no one was ringing a bell at the top a year and half ago.  And nobody will be letting you know which of these companies will be thriving and which will be vanishing – because the investors who understand all this are very busy accumulating them for themselves right now.

So it is no surprise that Wall Street missed by a mile on iconic companies that are thriving, including International Business Machines Corp. (NYSE: IBM), Apple Inc. (Nasdaq: AAPL), United States Steel (NYSE: X), PMC-Sierra Inc. (Nasdaq: PMCS), Level 3 Communications Inc. (Nasdaq: LVLT), 3M Corp. (NYSE: MMM), Colgate-Palmolive Co. (NYSE: CL), Automatic Data Processing Inc. (NYSE: ADP), United Parcel Service Inc. (NYSE: UPS), Merck & Co. Inc. (NYSE: MRK), and many others.  And Wall Street always seems to miss to the downside in its estimates in these superb companies.

In the same way, Wall Street missed it with Amazon.  You see, Amazon survived the dot-com bubble because, unlike most of the start-ups, Amazon actually had a strong-and-viable business model.  In addition, starting with founder and chairman, Jeffrey P. Bezos, and continuing down through the rest of the organization, Amazon has in place a superb management team that has continued to carefully refine and build upon the company’s original vision, and has continued to execute almost flawlessly.

It’s not just the great value, convenience and solid customer service that contribute to Amazon’s results – it’s also innovation.

Those “Killer Apps” – “Cloud Computing” and the Kindle

Amazon first revolutionized the bookstore business. Then it revolutionized overall retailing. Now it’s aiming at the book-publishing business with its super-lightweight electronic reading device – called the Kindle. The Kindle allows you to buy and download books in less than a minute – from almost anywhere – without the need to connect to a computer or any device. Lots of books are available.

This is all possible because you are using the fastest wireless standard and the service is included in the price of the book you downloaded. And Kindle can hold some 200 books, newspapers and blogs and has free wireless access to Wikipedia.  The newspapers and blogs are downloaded automatically and updated instantaneously.  Kindle recharges in less than two hours and you can also email your own Word documents and pictures.

With all these features, I am seriously considering buying one. Here’s why:

• It will eliminate the need to walk down my long driveway to grab my copy of The Wall Street Journal every morning.
• It will be much easier to read than in my PC.
• All my downloads will stored in Amazon’s servers, just in case I lose or damage my Kindle.
• And it will save me countless trips to the library to pick up books for myself, and for my avid-reader daughters.

However, I’m going to wait until after Monday (Feb. 9), because Amazon has invited the news media to an event it has planned for the Morgan Library & Museum in New York City. The scuttlebutt is that Amazon could be announcing the “Kindle 2.0.”

By saving trees (reducing the need for paper) and eliminating the costs for printing, storage and delivery, publishers can reduce their costs considerably and pass part of those savings on to the consumer.  Therefore, the typical book will cost you $10 or less.  And you can even get some steals, like all sixteen novels by Charles Dickens in a single file, with an active table of contents – all for only 99 cents!

It’s incredible.  No wonder Kindle is expanding sales and margins for Amazon.

But Amazon’s “miracle” performance is not due just to the Kindle.  Amazon has jumped in on the fast-growing trend of “cloud computing.”  Now that the Internet has become ultra-fast, and is getting even faster – thanks to such hyper-fast, high-speed fiber-optic networks as the Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE: VZ) FiOS broadband system – the balance has shifted towards centralized computing. 

What this means is that with a relatively cheap computer and fast Internet access, one can perform most of the computational activities in the servers of somebody else.  So, somebody else will host the applications, store the data and perform the computation – for a fee, as it is accessed via the Internet.

Therefore, the need to maintain the storage and back it up, to keep your systems up to date and even to help prevent viruses is essentially transferred to the supplier of the service. This is especially important for individual users and small- and medium-businesses, which look to minimize all these costs.  But it is also very useful for some large enterprises in services where Amazon’s scale and expertise can deliver superior cost-savings and reliability.

Amazon aims to be a major player in this realm. Indeed, some analysts believe this could one day be the “real” Amazon business, with books and other retail goods serving only to bring folks in the door.

Amazon already provides storage, virtual private servers, elastic cloud computing, which gives developers a resizable capacity, content delivery and a number of other functions through its fast-growing cloud-computing activities.

This cloud-computing trend has also been embraced by Google Inc. (Nasdaq: GOOG), though Google Apps, and Yahoo! Inc. (Nasdaq: YHOO), which has forced Microsoft Corp. (Nasdaq: MSFT), which is built on the premise of distributed computing, to hedge by planning to offer a cloud computing operating system.  The new operating system will enable net books (barebones notebooks), PDAs and other smartphones to take full advantage of sophisticated computing capabilities and massive storage located in the “cloud.”

Clearly, cloud computing will be an explosive business, especially in Amazon’s focus areas of storage, content distributions and scalable computational capacity. 

So, with book sales, electronics and its international efforts already strong and accelerating, and the probability of a Kindle 2.0 announcement now imminent, we need to jump on Amazon, while planning to keep the stock for several years.

Rocking With Retailing

Is this consistent with a sound investment strategy for retailing stocks in the current weak-economy market environment?

I recently saw a noted short-seller, who runs a very successful hedge fund (and you have to be good to be still alive), who indicated that for the first time in a long time, he saw opportunities to make money both on the long and on the short side.  This is encouraging, since for the year and a half prior to last November, the opportunities on the long side have been overwhelmed by the financial meltdown and massive de-leveraging. 

In addition, this hedge fund manager was asking a renowned investor in retail stocks what opportunities he saw for shorting these stocks.  The reply: You have to be very careful – even in retailers, which were experiencing big problems – because, in his opinion, valuations had fallen way too much.

I agree with both assessments. At this point, there are good opportunities to buy, and in retail you want to go with the winners.

For all the reasons we’ve detailed to you, Amazon is that “winner,” the strong company with a rock-solid business model that delivers value to customers, that innovates, that has a clear focus on expansion, and that is producing results even in one of the worst economic periods since the Great Depression.

Recommendation:  Buy Amazon.com Inc. (Nasdaq: AMZN) before Monday’s product announcement and ahead of the rollouts of the stimulus packages planned by both the United States and China (**).

[Editor's Note: Veteran Wall Streeter Horacio Marquez is the author of Money Morning's hugely popular "Buy, Sell or Hold" (BSH) series, and is also the editor of the longstanding "Money Moves Alert" trading service.

As the hundreds of thousands of readers across the Internet who've read Marquez's insightful BSH missives know, the longtime Wall Street insider has a knack for picking stocks that are poised to move. Indeed, when he recommended the Brazilian exchange traded fund - the iShares Brazil Index (NYSE: EWZ) - in late October, it zoomed 42% in six days.
In a new free report, Marquez has identified a category of stocks he has labeled "rocket stocks," which display key characteristics hinting that they're ready to move. One such characteristic: Heavy insider buying. In fact, one particular sector right now is seeing especially heavy insider buying - and many investors will be surprised to discover just what sector it is, and what companies top executives are buying into. For a free report that details these "rocket stock" plays, and that outlines this torrent of insider buying, please click here. The report is free of charge.]

(**) – Special Note of Disclosure: Horacio Marquez holds no interest in Amazon.com Inc.

News and Related Story Links:

• Money Morning Buy, Sell or Hold Feature:
  Buy, Sell or Hold: iShares MSCI Brazil Index.
• Money Morning News Analysis:
  Cost of Obama Stimulus Could Reach $1 Trillion Now That Newly Passed House Bill is Subject to Senate Compromise.
• Wikipedia:
  Home Page.
• Money Morning Special Report:
  The Lost Decade: How the U.S. Financial Crisis Resembles Japan’s Ten Years of Misery – And How to Play it (Part I of II).
• Money Morning Special Report:
  The Lost Decade: How the U.S. Financial Crisis Resembles Japan’s Ten Years of Misery – And How to Play it for Profit (Part II of II).
• Wikipedia:
  Dot-com bubble.
• Wikipedia:
  Kindle.
• Wikipedia:
  Cloud computing.
• OnlineLiterature.com:
  Charles Dickens.
• Silicon Alley Insider:
  Google, Amazon Lead Disruptive Cloud Computing Wave, Microsoft Again Behind Curve.
• Zdnet.blogs:
  Amazon’s cloud computing will surpass its retailing business.
• Money Morning Market Analysis:
  Hedge Funds Have Another $200 Billion to go to Complete Their “De-leveraging”

International Business Machines Corp. (NYSE: IBM) has “surprised” the market with flawless execution and strong profits.

A few months ago, I congratulated my nephew for getting an internship with IBM, while he studies business in Argentina.

“It is a superb global company, with a bullet-proof business model and a balance sheet that gives them a huge sustainable competitive advantage,” I said, advising him to use the opportunity to find his way to a permanent job with the company for after he graduates.

With its recent financial results, IBM made me look very prescient, and made my advice to my nephew look very shrewd, indeed. Despite the total meltdowns of the U.S. and global economies last October, IBM executed flawlessly and handily beat analysts’ earnings estimates, expanding both its margins and its profit outlook for 2009. And these two bottom-line-related improvements were made despite a slight drop in sales, which stemmed chiefly from the currency effects of an appreciating U.S. dollar.

The bottom line: IBM reported a 2008 fourth-quarter profit that was up 12% from the fourth quarter of 2007. The company earned $4.4 billion, or $3.38 a share, a result that was up 21% from the $2.80 a share from the year before. Analysts had expected IBM to earn only $3.03.  Total revenue was $27 billion, a slight decline from the $28.9 billion reported the year before.

Last Tuesday, IBM – also known as “Big Blue” – said it expects fiscal 2009 earnings of at least $9.20 per share. That’s nearly 5% better than the consensus estimate of $8.77, according to analysts surveyed by Reuters Estimates

This is just one more that Wall Street “surprisingly” got wrong.  In what has been a constant during this financial crisis, companies in industries ranging from steel to high tech have handily exceeded earnings estimates.

A notable exception, of course, has been the financials, where the companies saddled with subprime mortgages have been forced to mark down their portfolios to ridiculously low “market” prices (there is no market) on packaged securities that are trading at a fraction of their theoretical value. This, in turn, is affecting the equity of banks, and therefore their ability to lend.

In such an environment, many analysts adopted an “end of the world” scenario, where companies halt every possible activity in order to preserve cash.  So fund managers that went into premier high tech companies keep getting rewarded now, as these companies report, while their year-end performance metrics were distorted by Wall Street’s bearish bias.

Clearly, Wall Street’s extremely bearish perception is wrong, given the resiliency of the company’s business model.  The virtue of IBM’s model is that it has effectively transformed itself from the cyclical hardware company that gave it its name into a software-and-service-oriented firm that gives it a recurring revenue stream. In addition into this well-thought-out business model that concentrates on high-margin, value-added businesses.

Success with this strategy is due to IBM’s integrated approach to providing a total solution to its clients around the globe, which encompasses not only the determination of the customer needs, but also the provision of every aspect of the required technology solutions – including recurring maintenance, updating and even financing..

That last issue – financing – is crucial these days. And IBM’s long history in the world’s markets has given the company a longtime of recognition abroad, which really helps mitigate competitive threats from unproven newcomers.

IBM leaders have shrewdly increased the company’s investments in the fastest growth areas of the world, increasing its unparalleled geographic diversification as it keeps emphasizing its higher-value businesses – especially software, highly profitable middleware and services.

Geographically, most of the growth continued to come from the so-called “BRIC” countries (Brazil, Russia, India and China), which grew at a 13% clip, and within the emerging markets, which as a whole grew at a 6% clip. Underscoring the soundness of IBM’s global business was the fact that growth was essentially flat for the hard-hit U.S. market. This geographic shift and segment emphasis resulted in higher profit margins, which have more than doubled, causing earnings per share to more than triple in the last six years.

IBM’s global services – which include global technology and global business services – accounted for 53% of fourth quarter sales, while software delivered 24% and systems-and-technology 20%.  Very importantly, new deal signings amounted to a robust $17.2 billion, which gives IBM a solid outlook for 2009.  This evidenced a 20% growth from strategic outsourcing.

What we have here is a solid-and-growing revenue stream, matched with 9% growth, even in software, and a solid outlook.

An area of vulnerability could be financial services, which accounted for 30% of the company’s business.  Fortunately, the U.S. market – which has suffered the most from the global-financial downturn – only accounts for about a quarter of this business. Another challenge is the more-cyclical segment of systems and technology – mainly servers and storage – mainly servers and storage, which accounts for about 20% of sales, experienced a 16% decline in revenue and a 6% decline in margins.

But margin growth of 4.8% and 5.6% in IBM’s much-larger global-technology-services and global-business-services business segments more than compensated for this, resulting in overall margin expansion of 3% from last year.

Most importantly, IBM has a bullet-proof balance sheet and a fantastic cash flow of $7.9 billion. In times when others are suffering, IBM keeps producing a steady and increasing cash flow, and this financial strength allows the company to provide financing to its customers and keep sales rolling in. This is key; it enables IBM to either cherry-pick business from damaged competitors or buy them outright at cheap valuations.

Hence, IBM’s business model has been precisely been retooled over many years to face moments like this and thrive. If there’s a business lesson here it’s that the strong and resilient not only survive, but run away with the market. IBM’s stable and recurring revenue, geographic diversification, focus on higher-value-added business, and financial strength grants it invaluable defenses against both economic and competitive threats.

Recommendation:  With the earnings surprise and the market’s sudden reversal, the shares of International Business Machines Corp. (NYSE: IBM) have rallied aggressively.  But the story is still intact.  What’s more, the many stimulus plans being implemented around the world will no doubt increase demand in many of IBM’s product-and-service areas. Even the huge consolidation in banking and other industries will boost demand for information-technology products and services.

Hence, the upside is still under-appreciated at the current valuation.  At a forward Price/Earnings (P/E) ratio of less than 10.0, and a Price/Earnings to Earnings Growth Rate (P/E to Growth Rate) ‘PEG ratio’ of about 1.0, the shares of this growing company with strongly reliable earnings deserves much higher multiples.  I would not be surprised to see IBM’s stock price going up by 50% over the next couple of years. Buy half a position right now and complete the remaining half by buying on days of market weakness before IBM’s next earnings report. Plan on putting the shares away for two years (**).

(**) – Special Note of Disclosure: Horacio Marquez holds no interest in IBM Corp.

News and Related Story Links:

• Reuters:
  IBM Corporation Issues FY 2009 EPS Guidance Above Analysts’ Estimates.
• Money Morning Special Investment Report:
  Special Report: Hit the BRICs for a Global-Investing Double Play (Part I).
• Money Morning Special Investment Report:
  Special Report: Hit the BRICs for a Global-Investing Double Play (Part II).
• Money Morning Buy, Sell or Hold:
  Buy, Sell or Hold: ABB Ltd..
• Wikipedia:
  PEG Ratio.

Although ABB Ltd. (ADR: ABB) has been around for 120 years, it’s one of those rare companies that’s kept current with the times. It continues to do so and those efforts are generating tangible results.
             �
Indeed, as Money Morning noted in its July 7 overview of ABB, the Zurich-based industrial giant is a virtual lock to benefit from the many billions in stimulus money governments around the globe will be directing into such infrastructure-related areas as highway, construction and power-generation.

These promising opportunities remain.  In fact – with the $586 billion stimulus China unveiled in early November, and the $825 billion stimulus plan that President-elect Barack Obama is kicking around, ABB’s growth opportunities have probably actually been enhanced, because infrastructure projects and job-creation are at the core of both packages.

In late October, ABB reported strong earnings for its third quarter, beating analysts’ estimates, while reaffirming its strong growth guidance for the firm’s still-to-be-reported fourth-quarter results.

In its third-quarter report, for instance, ABB reported strong (23%) year-over-year revenue growth, as well as a hefty increase in operating-profit margins (as measured by EBIT, or earnings before interest and taxes) to a healthy 14.5%.

So why are we revisiting our earlier report? What’s changed since we last looked at ABB? No surprise here: It’s the increasing uncertainty over the timing of these opportunities, given the ongoing – and, at times, escalating – global financial crisis. ABB took special note of this in the management report that accompanied its third-quarter financial statement.

“It’s too early to say how the recent financial-market turmoil will impact our markets in the short term, but our operational strength and flexibility, leading technology, competitive cost base and solid balance sheet put us in a good position to meet a tougher market. We are on target to deliver on our 2008 growth guidance,” ABB said in a statement that day.

After I published my cautious “Buy” recommendation, ABB shares rallied about 4%, a move that peaked near the end of July – which is right about the time that the Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (LEHMQ) saga began exerting pressure on the stock market. That saga – which culminated with the brokerage firm’s Sept. 15 bankruptcy filing – precipitated an entire chain of events, which included the rescue of insurer American International Group Inc. (AIG), and widespread de-leveraging in the hedge-fund sector, all of which we’ve covered closely here in Money Morning.

By October, this financial collapse had evolved into a credit squeeze that paralyzed the world’s key economies – including the United States – in October. As the U.S. financial system ground to a halt, and as the effects reverberated across the world, growth projections for almost every country were revised downward and international-bank financing all but disappeared.  Financing is a key issue in long-term infrastructure projects, since many of those big-ticket jobs could get delayed if financing is not readily available.
                                                                                                                                                               �
Thus, the financial crisis, has affected ABB’s stock price, both because of the forced de-leveraging and because of the downward revisions to estimated earnings per share. The stock came down from about $27 to a double-bottom low of $10 in October and November, and then rallied 50% to close the year at $15.01.

So what’s next for ABB’s shares?

For starters, the company is seeing a slowdown in large contracts: “Large project orders declined significantly, reflecting in part a comparison with a very strong quarter a year ago,” ABB stated when it reported its third-quarter results. “In addition, customers’ decisions on a number of industrial and infrastructure investments have been delayed as a result of the recent market uncertainty.”

ABB will be reporting its fourth quarter results on Feb. 12.  In late December, when it set the date for that report, ABB announced it would be taking a fourth-quarter provision of $850 million for anti-competitive price-fixing, for a legal provision for suspicious payments in the United States, as well as for a tax dispute, restructuring charges and asset impairment.  At the same time, however, the company announced it has found more than $1 billion in cost savings. That latter revelation is consistent with expected continued margin improvements, a conclusion reached in our earlier “Buy, Sell or Hold” column.

Although some issues of concern have arisen, there are a number of mitigating factors. These positive factors might even turn the story completely around in short order and will definitely be a huge plus in years to come.

As the company stated above, ABB has a number of very strong positives working in its favor. Sales in emerging economies outpaced sales in advanced economies for the first time in the company’s history in 2008. The afore-mentioned $586 billion China stimulus is heavily focused on infrastructure projects, as well as consumer spending (For an excellent overview of the overall investment opportunities China presents, take a look at my colleague Don Miller’s recent “Money Morning Outlook 2009 Series” installment on China. To read that report, which is free of charge, please click here).

But this infrastructure theme is not limited only to China. It’s a common threat that runs through virtually all the stimulus plans announced by countries all around the world in recent months. Even President-elect Barack Obama, in unveiling his own stimulus plan, made it clear that infrastructure will be a central component of his job-creating stimulus plan. One key goal: The modernization of the aging-and-inefficient U.S. energy grid.

Europe’s infrastructure is likewise old and in dire need of a major makeover. And emerging economies such as India, Brazil and Chile will continue to use their new-found wealth to stimulate their economies by staying on course with their ambitious infrastructure plans.

There’s an important point to understand here. Anytime major infrastructure investments are planned, investors can be assured that major investments in power-generation and power-transmission will be a central element of the billions in economic infusions. It has to be that way. You see, investments in power generation (and transmission) have a direct correlation with gross domestic product (GDP) growth. What’s more, as much as 90% of the world’s growth this year will come from emerging economies around the world – markets that are already driving sales for ABB.

For example, Chile’s stabilization fund has reached some $24 billion dollars, or 14% of GDP.  This type of savings by countries that pursued sound economic policies during healthy periods is now enabling those same countries to mitigate the effects of the worldwide financial crisis, even as they continue to grow.

There are relatively few emerging markets to totally steer clear of, although Argentina is certainly one to be avoided.

In sum, while the financial disruptions have slowed down the pace of infrastructure spending, stimulus packages are keeping those projects from disappearing completely – and are perhaps even serving to stretch them out.

ABB may be one of the few companies positioned to benefit from all these trends. The company has a bullet-proof balance sheet, strong margins and solid cash flow. These strengths will mitigate the fallout from the financial crisis and over the long haul will keep propelling this giant to higher profits.  The market has already discounted the slowdown, but has not discounted the cost-cutting efforts, whose details have been sketchy so far.  We continue to be very upbeat about ABB’s prospects and will look at any market weakness in the year’s first half as a buying opportunity.

Action to take:  Buy shares of ABB Ltd. (ADR: ABB). The stock has been buoyed in anticipation of the so-called “January Effect,” although the U.S. stock market has badly misbehaved since then (**).

Given the uncertainty, if you haven’t already established a position in ABB shares – as I urged in my prior column – then I would split my purchases so that they are made before and after the mid-February earnings report. But I would not “chase” it, and I would save some cash in order to possibly add the last 20% towards the end of the first quarter, as visibility about the U.S. and Chinese infrastructure plans improves, and as the company’s legal hassles become more clear.

(**) – Special Note of Disclosure: Horacio Marquez holds no interest in ABB Ltd.

News and Related Story Links:

• Money Morning Buy, Sell or Hold:
  Buy, Sell or Hold: ABB Ltd..
• Money Morning Economic Outlook 2009 Series Archive:
  Total Archive.
• Money Morning Economic Outlook 2009 Series:
  China’s Red Dragon Turns Financial Crisis into Opportunity.
• Money Morning News Analysis:
  Massive China Stimulus is Viewed as an Attempt to Help the West.
• Money Morning Week Ahead Column:
  $800 Billion Obama Stimulus will be Topic of Debate Through Inauguration.
• Money Morning News Analysis:
  Hedge Funds Have Another $200 Billion to go to Complete Their “De-leveraging”.
• Money Morning News Analysis:
  Federal Government Grants AIG a New Bailout Package.
• ABB Corporate Press Release:
  ABB fourth-quarter results to be impacted by pre-tax provisions of about $850 million.

Contributing Editor

Money Morning

Research in Motion Ltd. (Nasdaq: RIMM) – maker of the ubiquitous BlackBerry – is likely to consolidate and increase its market share.

Almost all of our “Buy, Sell or Hold” recommended stocks started out on the right foot here in the New Year.  And our strategy of building up a position gradually up to year-end – to avoid the downward pressure of tax-loss selling, and other volatility – seems to have worked. This has left some cash on the sidelines to take advantage of any sell-offs that are sure to come in the first quarter.

In this environment, plagued with uncertainties, we are going to focus on companies that have bulletproof balance sheets (meaning they require no outside financing), enjoy a sustainable competitive advantage, regularly record high profit margins, and execute their strategies well.
The Waterloo, Ontario-based Research in Motion meets all of these requirements and pops up in our quantitative and qualitative screens prominently. And it helps a lot to have seen this Canadian company handily beat its third-quarter results.

RIMM has a solid, highly defensible franchise in its core market, the enterprise mobile phone segment. You see, the Blackberry line of smartphones has become the “must-have” gadget of managers in Corporate America. And not just because it’s a cool sign of corporate status – the phones are true productivity enhancers among corporate systems managers.

I called the experts just to verify this.  First, I queried a friend who runs systems for a Fortune 50 firm. For obvious reasons, my friend requested anonymity, both individually and for the company.

“If I had to implement a system now, the BlackBerry is the safest choice,” my friend explained.

And because the BlackBerry was specifically designed for this audience – a lucrative market segment – the device features many capabilities that just aren’t available in competing products. And if they are available, the features aren’t as well integrated into those rivaling devices.

To further buttress my research, I also called my good friend Brenda Lewis, a principal with the Greenwich, CT-based Transactions Marketing Inc., and a venture manager who has launched many mission-critical wireless businesses and who lives and breathes mobile phones.

Lewis is an independent thinker and isn’t “married” to any particular technology, and she was equally bullish: “RIMM has been innovative – ahead of IT officers’ requirements in security and in their ability to accommodate corporate applications.”

And not only did she confirm the technological edge and superior capabilities that the Blackberry platform has over the competition, she went on to elaborate on a market rumor that has been going around for some time – that Microsoft Corp. (Nasdaq: MSFT) will buy RIMM.

“The probability of Microsoft acquiring RIMM is exceptionally low,” Lewis said.

I am not sure I concur, since the Windows and Blackberry market shares would comprise a very small percentage of the overall market.  Earlier in 2008 the market shares were:

“lack of personal discretionary income in most markets.”

She was right.  Subsequently, industry researcher Gartner Inc. (NYSE: IT) predicted that global sales of mobile phones would dip between 1.0% and 4.0% – even with 308 million mobile phones being shipped in the third quarter. Gartner’s forecast was consistent with a forecast by IT researcher IDC.  IDC predicted a drop of more than 2% globally, despite a pickup 9.0% sales pickup in smartphones for 2009.

But even in a generally cautious environment for wireless devices, this pickup in smartphone sales bodes well for the rulers of the space: Apple Inc. (Nasdaq: AAPL) and Research in Motion. Apple had been outpacing RIMM in sales the quarter before, but RIMM’s launching of three new “must have” Blackberry models should pay some major dividends. The BlackBerry Storm – RIMM’s first touch-screen smartphone – is a direct counterpunch to Apple’s iPhone 3G, which allegedly poses some security risks that become problematic in the corporate environment.  And the Storm, together with the BlackBerry Storm 9000 and the BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8220 will probably propel RIMM as the major market share gainer in the market in the current quarter, as evidenced by the success of the Storm on Black Friday.

In fact, with this early success already well underway, RIMM projected a large increase in revenue this quarter, to as much as $3.3 to $3.5 billion.  Both Apple and RIMM trail mobile device king Nokia Corp. (NYSE ADR: NOK) in market share. With its focus on the consumer – and not the corporate – market, Nokia leads the world with a 40% market share in the smartphone market, followed by Apple with 17% and Research in Motion with 15%.  So the bottom line for both Apple and RIMM is that they will gain market share from Nokia and other makers in a smartphone market that is growing at a 9.0% annual clip.

Research in Motion is poised to do very well for the follow reasons:

• It’s selling into a market segment that’s continuing to grow at a hefty single-digit pace.
• It is technologically dominant in the big-spending corporate market.
• It stands to boost its market share in both the overall smartphone segment and in the corporate segment.
• It has three new models on the market in the BlackBerry Storm the BlackBerry Storm 9000 and the BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8220 – which should enable it to snag additional market share.

All in all, these factors and others should enable Research in Motion should do well in this quarter, and throughout this year in general – despite the negative developments in the global economy.

RIMM shares bottomed at about $36 on Dec. 3, the day it downgraded its outlook. It has rallied some 20% from that quick bottom and has since been repeatedly testing these levels.  At these levels, the stock is already back to the range out of which it started 2007 and proceeded to log in a 250% climb. 

Research in Motion shares closed Friday at $41.92, and have traded as high as $148.13 in the past 52 weeks.

So with all the aforementioned competitive advantages, the stock correction that seems to have run its course and a valuation that results in the lowest PEG (Price/Earnings to Earnings Growth Rate) ratio among its comparable peers (Apple, Nokia and Microsoft), RIMM is a compelling buy.

Recommendation: Buy RIMM shares immediately. But don’t purchase your entire intended position all at once. Leave some firepower to buy a second block of shares during a strong pullback in the stock or in the general market – should one occur – or after the company reports results from the current quarter. (**)

(**) – Special Note of Disclosure: Horacio Marquez holds no interest in Research in Motion.

News and Related Story Links:

• Money Morning Buy, Sell or Hold Feature:Buy, Sell or Hold: Apple Inc.
• IDC.com:�

  Mobile Phone Market Poised for Slowdown in 2009, Says IDC. 

The “right” Latin America will thrive in the New Year, fueled by ts own growth – with an assist from the continued hot growth from China – while the “wrong” Latin America will get left behind.

The second phase of emerging markets expansion is well on its way – a period of self-sustaining growth, driven by consumer growth and infrastructure spending.  And Latin America, following China and other Asian economies, is one of the key global pillars of growth that will save the global economy and the U.S. financial system from total collapse. But not all the countries in Latin America will go on to prosper.  There is a wide gulf in the policies that will continue to separate the winners from the losers.

Let me explain.

In a recent article in our affiliated monthly newsletter, The Money Map Report, Money Morning Investment Director Keith Fitz-Gerald made three important points:

• The emerging markets (of which Latin America is the second-most-important leg) will play a growing role in the continued long-term growth of the world economy.
• The U.S. economy will continue to grow long-term, but its relative importance in the world economy will continue to decline.
• In the near term, the emerging markets could well play a determining role in keeping the overall global economy – and the U.S. financial system – from dropping into a depression-like funk that we won’t be free of for years. Emerging economies in Asia and parts of Latin America have huge cash reserves, much of which will be invested in infrastructure projects over the next 20 years.

In the next three years, China, alone will invest as much as $725 billion in infrastructure, while Brazil will invest $225 billion for the same purpose.
This is important to remember, given that the dramatic sell-off the emerging markets have experienced has many investors doubting the ability of these countries to “decouple” from the global economy.  The reality of the situation is that most investors and pundits are failing to differentiate between economic decoupling and market decoupling.

The Gloomy Present

While growth in emerging economies has dropped slightly, the prices of securities and currencies in emerging markets has fallen drastically.   Many investors think that the U.S. economic crash will lead to a dramatic drop in U.S. orders of emerging-market products, which will cause those economies to drop off. That, in turn, would squeeze the profits and market valuations of the companies that operate in these economies.

But that’s a mistaken assumption. And here’s why.

In Brazil, for instance, exports account for a mere 13% of gross domestic product (GDP). In China, exports are just 10% of GDP. So some contraction in U.S. and European orders can easily be counterbalanced by fiscal and monetary stimulus in these countries.

On Oct. 27, in the depths of a rabid, indiscriminate sell-off, I published an extremely bullish piece on Brazil. Since that article was published, Brazil went on to rally as much as 47%. As of Friday’s close – even after some subsequent profit-taking – the exchange traded fund (ETF) that represents the Brazilian market (EWZ) is still up 21% (and has risen as much as 42% since my recommendation). 

And most emerging markets economies have plenty of fiscal and monetary maneuvering room. Leading the pack is China, which accounted for some 27% of global growth last year, and which has continued to use both fiscal and monetary tools to keep itself on a solid growth path.

It recently slashed interest rates again, down to 6.66% (a lucky number in the Chinese culture, meaning “things (are) going smoothly”).  With record foreign reserves of $1.9 trillion, China also approved a “fast and heavy-handed” $586 billion stimulus, mainly in housing and infrastructure, to be implemented through 2010.  And the Chinese yuan will drop almost 7% vis-a-vis the U.S. dollar to cushion losses in trade.  It has also lowered taxes on investments in capital goods.  And in a key move that’s been almost totally overlooked by the media, China has made huge market-oriented reforms in agriculture. 

China has just allowed its 780 million farmers to rent, transfer or utilize as collateral their rights to their lands and eliminated all taxes on agricultural production and to farmers.  This will allow for a massive increase in the scale of production by consolidating companies.  In this way, China will keep its 120 million hectares dedicated to agriculture exclusively, with no possibility of urbanization, while at the same time allowing the millions of small farmers to sell out, and get capital to move to the cities.  This will not only increase the productivity of Chinese farming dramatically by allowing for economies of scale to work and attracting billions in investments, it also will create a huge incentive for these millions of farmers to move to the cities, boosting housing and infrastructure demand.

Brazil’s plans are very similar to those of China. There’s a:

• Strong fiscal stimulus, allowing a drop in the value of the real currency (a decline that’s already been substantial) in order to cushion exports.
• An easing of capital requirements to Brazil’s strong banking system, which will incentivize housing and car loans.
• Export financing.
• And huge local infrastructure projects.

There is another little-understood phenomenon that cushions the blows for emerging economies: Intra-emerging market trade has become increasingly important.  By now everybody understands that iron ore from Brazil and coal and oil from other emerging markets is flowing into China in order to fuel China’s massive infrastructure buildup and growing consumer demand.

The Breakdown on Brazil

Increasingly, a growing proportion of the infrastructure needs of industrial goods being bought by emerging economies are goods produced by other emerging economies.  Trade between Latin America and China has increased by 13 times since 1995, from $8.4 billion to $100 billion.  And China, now the second-most-important commercial partner to the region after the United States, has finally been accepted as a member of the Inter-American Development Bank, committing itself to contribute $350 million to the bank. As an example of this growth in industrial trade, Argentina just bought 279 subway cars from China’s CITIC Group.

However, not all trade with China has been successful, due to China’s notable deficiencies in quality control, especially in health standards.  For example, Latin American imports of medicines manufactured in China had catastrophic results in Panama two years ago, where more than 100 people died and hundreds more became ill from medications containing toxic Chinese glycerine.  Recently, Panama detected toxic chemicals in imported Chinese sweets and crackers and Argentina’s customs recently seized Chinese 20,000 thermos containers for having elevated content of toxic chemicals.

And all of this means that there is a market disconnect between the prices of Brazilian shares and those elsewhere in Latin American equities and the fundamentals of the underlying companies, that we will see played out in the next and subsequent years.  Why?

Just because huge financial losses by banks precipitated a massive de-leveraging cycle, which means they had to sell their holdings, regardless of merit. And that included big sell-offs in preferred investments, including the hugely promising and profitable Petroleo Brasileiro SA (Petrobras) (ADR: PBR), Vale (ADR: RIO), and many others.

And what is worse, their sales hit the stop losses of major hedge funds, who were also leveraged in such favorite plays as commodities, steel, coal, agro, emerging markets and even defensive stocks such as the U.S.-based Pepsico Inc. (PEP). 

When you have the proprietary positions of banks and hedge funds all trying to get out of the same door at the same time because of risk management issues, you get the current disconnect between market fundamentals and pricing.

Another impact that we have to understand is that the ongoing dramatic interest rate drops in all major G7 economies and the more than $3 trillion in G7 fiscal programs will have a marked impact on growth next year, containing what would have been a much nastier economic contraction.  But while G7 countries will barely grow between negative 0.5% and a positive 1% in 2009, with the worst contraction front-loaded and recovering in the second half, emerging economies will grow at a minimum of 4%, and in the case of China maybe as high as 10%.

In my October Brazil analysis, I detailed the massive stress that Brazil came under in 1995 because of another exogenous shock: The Mexican devaluation, the so-called “Tequila effect,” which ricocheted around the world, and which caught Brazil in 1995 in a much weaker position than it is in today. Back then, Brazil had a much higher level of debt, much lower reserves, a fiscal sector that needed huge reform, and a much lower capacity for exports.  Brazil dealt with this massive stress effectively and went on to work at each one of its weaknesses in the next 13 years, getting itself into a position of strength today.

While having the temptation and the perfect excuse for a default right at hand, Brazil proved its seriousness back then by taking the hard, but certain road to progress, keeping its international commitments and gradually affecting strong structural reforms.  Since then, it has become a net creditor to the world; it controlled inflation, and avoided an overheating of its economy with tight fiscal and monetary policies during the recent run-up in commodity prices.

This is paying off strongly today.  The policies, run day to day by a sophisticated technocracy led by top economists and international bankers, many of which held top positions in leading international banks, has allowed Brazil to move forward and to anticipate GDP growth of 4% to 5% for the New Year.
Hence, Brazil is by far my favorite Latin American play for 2009.

Checking Out Chile

Following closely behind, and hindered only by its small size, is the poster child of fiscal and monetary prudence: Chile.

Chile, which came out of its 1970s default by eliminating its foreign debt and successfully restructuring its banking system, has made every effort to maintain very prudent fiscal and monetary policies and to diversify its exports away from copper, which, being the largest exporter of the metal in the world, still accounted for 38% of its GDP. 

Today, Chile exports many diversified products, including agricultural products, wine, fertilizers and industrial wares.  And because it’s situated on the Pacific Coast, it is geographically well positioned to trade with the fastest-growing markets in the world – China and the other emerging Asian tigers.

But Chile, in order to minimize the cyclical nature of its economy due to the wide fluctuation in the price of copper, decided years ago to start a “rainy-day” fund, which would accumulate wealth in the good years and be used to soften the blow in the bad ones.  Now, Chile boasts a $28 billion sovereign wealth fund, accumulated almost completely from its copper profits.  That’s almost equal to a staggering 14% of the country’s GDP in cash savings!  This will enable Chile to implement counter-cyclical policies to keep growing at 3.5% to 4% next year – or about the current rate of growth, even with the worldwide meltdown.

Chile already has started to deploy this capital, having passed a $1.15 billion government plan on top of last month’s $850 million to stimulate housing and small-business lending, injecting that capital into a government bank that will make available loans for small businesses.

Avoid Argentina

Chile’s fiscal prudence is in direct contrast to Argentina’s lack of discipline.  Argentina’s Peronist government, which squandered the agricultural commodities bonanza in fiscal spending, is now is trying to use its majority in both houses in Congress to pass the nationalization of the privatized pension funds under the excuse of “protecting them from market volatility.” 

These funds, which now have successfully grown to more than $30 billion in size, or 73% of the government’s budget and have returned an average of more than 13% a year since inception will allow the government to cover its fiscal gap and debt maturities next year and to financed public works and consumption projects.  The government, at the same time, is suffering from an important loss of confidence, as evidenced by its need to resort to police controls in order to prevent the illegal purchase of U.S. Dollars.  Argentina might end 2009 with growth of negative 2% and unemployment of 10%.  Stay away.

A “Maybe” for Mexico

Mexico, given its strong links to the United States, is receiving a heavy dose of external shocks on many economic and financial fronts – especially where the United States is concerned: It’s being hit by a drop in exports (the United States is the main component), the drop in oil prices, lower tourism (its largest proportion of travelers is from the United States), falling U.S. investments in Mexico, and reduced remittances from Mexicans working in the United States back to their Mexican relatives.

In addition, many companies suffered strong losses in their derivatives hedges, banks have had to reduce lending due to reduced liquidity and the Mexican peso has lost some 22% of its value against the U.S. dollar.  Mexico’s growth in the New Year may fall to about 1% from 2008’s 2.4% pace, and the country is on its way to approving the first budget with a fiscal deficit in four years.  The government’s target will be negative 1.8% of GDP, in order to stimulate the economy.  Mexico, seeing its oil production declining, is seen moving soon towards opening some oil areas for exploration and development, which some estimate could add another 1% to GDP.

Once the U.S. markets have stabilized, Mexico’s stocks will be an incredible buy once more, since they discount a very bad scenario at these prices.

A Case Against Colombia

Colombia, another country that has merited a lot of attention, given its staunch support of U.S. anti-drug and anti-money-laundering efforts, has seen its free trade agreement with the United States inexplicably delayed. 

The country foresees a tightening of credit conditions, so it is moving up its peso-based borrowing to this year.  Next year it will issue only $1 billion in foreign bonds and tap $1.4 billion from multi-lateral lenders.  So the refinancing risk for Colombia is muted, given the small amounts involved, and the country’s economy should expand a minimum of 1% in the New Year, even in the worst economic scenario. However, Colombia could grow as much as 4% under a moderate scenario.

That would represent a big drop from the 8% growth recorded this year.

The story in Colombia has been the curbing of inflation, and how far behind the curve the central bank has been, at least as recently as July, when it boosted rates up to 10% and then kept them there.

These ultra-high interest rates, combined with the global slowdown, have blunted demand for consumer products in Colombia. Since the passage of the trade pact is a situation in flux, I want to wait and see right now.

I will not go into the economies of Venezuela, Bolivia and Ecuador, which, with massive intervention by their governments and advances against property rights, are experiencing severe economic and political stress, and which do not offer the guarantees needed for foreign investment.

News and Related Story Links:

• Money Morning Buy, Sell or Hold Feature:
  Buy, Sell or Hold: iShares MSCI Brazil Index.
• Money Morning Global Investing Roundups:
  Brazil ETF Rises as Much as 42%.
• Money Morning News Analysis:
  Massive China Stimulus is Viewed as an Attempt to Help the West.
• Money Morning News Analysis:
  With its Pension Fund Grab, is it ‘Déjà Vu All Over Again’ For Argentina?

With BHP Billiton Ltd. (NYSE ADR: BHP), it’s a case of the strong getting stronger and possibly even running away from the pack.

Back in 2001, BHP Ltd. and Billiton PLC merged to form BHP Billiton Ltd., the world’s
leading diversified resources group. And it never looked back.

Now, the lowest-cost natural-resources producer with the broadest portfolio of offerings, BHP superbly positioned itself to weather the current global downturn. Indeed, back in June the company reported its seventh-consecutive year of record profits. Financially, the company is well positioned to maintain its high level of investment in its business.

And because the Melbourne, Australia-based mining giant has so many of its operations in the Pacific region, it is perfectly positioned to continue serving two of the world’s fastest-growing markets: China and India.

The bottom line: BHP is exceptionally well diversified – not only in terms of the commodities it mines and sells, but also in terms of the markets it serves. This has allowed it to minimize the regulatory, climatic and geological risks it faces.

And that diversification is paying off. As millions of people emerge from poverty in Asia and other markets from around the world – led by the creation of a massive middle class in China and fueled by global synchronic growth – the demand for commodities will soar in the years to come. And so will commodity prices.

China alone has expanded the worldwide demand for steel by an amount that equaled the combined production of Canada and Mexico. Over the past year – from copper to coking coal to crude oil – we saw similarly impressive growth statistics around the world, an uptick that is putting pressure on the capacity of the commodity producers around the world. During that time, BHP’s profits grew spectacularly, but it’s also important to note that the company grew in a very balanced and conservative manner.

At a time that many international banks came close to collapsing and needing recapitalizations, BHP posted a net operating cash flow of  “only” $18 billion. This strong cash flow, combined with a very low net debt leverage of only 22% at the end of June, has allowed the company to maintain its share buyback program and increased value for investors. It’s also allowed for a generous increase in BHP’s dividend, which at Monday’s closing price of $40.40, yields an appetizing 4.06% and that could easily get to the 5%-6% area soon.

The company also has dropped its bid for

BHP’s decision to end its takeover of Aussie mining rival Rio Tinto PLC (NYSE ADR: RTP) was also a good one.  Rio Tinto’s acquisition of Alcan Inc. put Rio in a leveraged position, which increased that company’s credit and business risks. Besides, in a time of low liquidity and scarce financing for deals, the divestments of assets that a merged BHP-RTP would have to complete to receive the needed financing would have so devalued the deal that it almost wouldn’t have been worth doing.

What About the Global Recession?

The recession has greatly impacted commodity prices. Oil has dropped from its record level of more than $147 a barrel in July, to less than $40 a barrel. Analysts are forecasting a near 60% drop in the price of coking coal for next year, as well as price declines of 20% to 30% for aluminum, copper and nickel.

But even with these price declines, BHP’s margins could actually expand in many of its key lines, as marginal players shut off production and BHP’s volumes expand. Cost-cutting, new lower-cost production, and synergies may also offset the adverse effects of falling prices.

Additionally, prices for iron ore and coking coal could actually start to rebound as more governments turn their attention to massive infrastructure projects and the need to diversify energy sources. 

For example, BHP is still moving ahead with an expansion in its uranium production, as the company has “so far been able to substantially maintain sales volumes.”

At the same time, the uncertainties with respect to prices are huge.  Currently, from iron ore, to copper and aluminum, price negotiations for next year’s contracts have gone nowhere.  Buyers insist on bringing contract prices closer to the now-lower spot prices, but producers are trying to minimize the damage by waiting for prices to bounce back.

Until that happens, the old contracted prices – which are much higher than the current spot prices – are still in effect for much of BHP’s volume. Of course they will come down, but the real question is by how much. 

Why Commodities Could Come Back Faster than Wall St. Thinks

Wall Street estimates have are extremely bearish at the moment. That is reflected in BHP’s stock price, which has been slashed by nearly three quarters in the past nine months.

However, I do not believe any of the current price projections are factoring in the two “mothers of all infrastructure-stimulus plans,” being launched simultaneously by China and the United States. The operative word here is stimulus.  And the focus of these plans is infrastructure, which uses huge amounts of steel, copper and other raw materials.

Also, all of these commodities are priced in U.S. dollars.  And the U.S. Federal Reserve just happened to drop the benchmark Federal Funds rate down to nearly 0.00%, while also shifting its monetary printing presses into overdrive. This is likely to lead to an orderly decline of the dollar, and consequently, a rise in commodities prices.

Other countries are in the same boat – from China, India and Australia, to the European Union, and even to Brazil and Chile. In every case, the central banks are dropping interest rates and bank-reserve requirements, and launching stimulus plans along similar lines, even as their central governments are cutting taxes.

Inflation will be a key result. And a declining dollar and zero interest rates are the winds behind the sails of commodity prices.

My expectation is that demand for steel will surprise analysts to the upside as these stimulus plans start kicking in.  In fact, we have already seen some minor firming of steel prices in China, as well as a solidifying of bulk shipping rates.  Further helped by a weaker dollar and zero interest rates, commodity prices will rebound from this year’s weakness.  This will enable analysts to actually abandon their “end-of-the-world” scenarios for commodity prices as the prospects for higher-negotiated prices increase.

We already are seeing increased actions by the Chinese government, which has continued to drop interest rates and bank reserve requirements, and has increased support to consumer lending, as well as the housing sector.  In China, more than any other large economy, government action is crucial, and the direction is in favor of higher economic activity. 

At this very low valuation and with a very loose global monetary policies almost certain to give it a tailwind, BHP’s stock has already found some buyers at lower levels and has been able to cross its exponential 200-day moving average to the upside for the first time in this bear market. 

It’s a proven fact that recessions are the best times to pick up cyclical stocks for the long term.

No question about this: the recession will end someday.  Many, including the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and myself, expect a pick-up in activity in the second half of 2009.  And stocks typically run some six months ahead of the economy. 

Even as we are getting horrible economic news in the fourth quarter, as the full effect of the global paralysis is revealed in economic metrics, we should note that stocks vary according to the second derivative of profits:  In other words, they respond to changes in the rate of profit growth (or contraction).

Right now, market projections in general and in BHP in particular, factor in the full effect of a horrible fourth quarter. But if the first and subsequent quarters, although still bad, are “less bad” than this current quarter, the stock could actually rally from here, while still in the midst of bad news. And this process, while not linear, and mired with confusing volatility, should deliver strong profits.

ACTION TO TAKE: Buy BHP Billiton Ltd. (NYSE ADR: BHP). This is roughly the right time for an investor to pick up BHP shares for the long run, especially ahead of the so-called “January Effect,” if there is one this year. However, the uncertainties remain daunting in terms of commodities pricing, government policies and the global economy.  So it is a good idea to stagger the purchases over the next three months by buying half of your position before yearend and the other half on weak days in the first quarter.  I would wait on most of the others, other than Vale (NYSE ADR: RIO), given their weaker financial position, lower margins and more exposure to price drops in commodities. (**)

(**) – Special Note of Disclosure: Horacio Marquez holds no interest in BHP Billiton Ltd.

News and Related Story Links:

• Money Morning News:
  Bank of China Tries to Spur Economy with Fifth Rate Cut in Three Months.
• Money Morning News Analysis:
  Massive China Stimulus is Viewed as an Attempt to Help the West.
• Wikipedia:
  January Effect.

In an appearance on NBC’s “Meet the Press” on Sunday,
Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (NYSE: WMT) Chief Executive Officer H. Lee Scott Jr. said the recession is changing consumer-buying habits.

What Scott didn’t say is that Wal-Mart is perfectly positioned to capitalize on those changes.

“The No.1 issue today is [consumers'] concern about their job,” Scott said during the nationally televised interview. And because of that concern, Scott said consumers are making some of the following changes:

• In the discounter’s “pharmacy group, we have increases in prescription drugs, but not at the same rate it was. What we’re seeing is an increase in self-treatment.”
• Cash-strapped shoppers also are making different food choices, meaning Wal-Mart is “seeing an increase in food storage as people are cooking more at home.” Consumers are “using leftovers more extensively,” and buying more frozen food.
• Even the owners of small businesses are altering their buying patterns to better manage their cash flow, by shopping more frequently, but by buying less than usual during each visit, Scott said. For instance, restaurant owners stop in more often and buy a day’s supplies at a time, which stretches out that cash flow and reduces spoilage.

At a time when the U.S. retail sector is in the throes of its worst stretch in years, Wal-Mart may be the one retailer that investors want to own. The world’s largest retailer, Wal-Mart last month reported a 10% jump in its third-quarter earnings per share. The company’s sales jumped 10%.

That performance is a big part of the investment case for Wal-Mart: Here we are, a year into a recession, and Wal-Mart, a retailer, is posting a double-digit gain in profits, and a healthy single-digit increase in sales.

This apparently counter-intuitive trend is actually a typical phenomena reserved for market leaders who also enjoy cost leadership in their own industry.

Let me explain.

In any industry – and especially one in which one firm’s wares can be easily substituted by those of a rival (which is very true of retailing) – the key to survival is to have a cost advantage over the competition. As demand falters, the low-cost player is able to under-price its rivals, attract additional traffic, gain market share and thrive, while the weakest players get squeezed right out of the business.

In the retail sector, this is playing out like a Harvard Business School case study.  For November, Wal-Mart’s comparable-store sales increased 3.4%, while most of its competition saw actual sales declines. Even consumer-products king Procter & Gamble Co. (NYSE: PG) is showing that its sales through Wal-Mart are increasing, while sales through other retailers are down.

Wal-Mart’s unrivaled ability to buy in huge volumes allows it to obtain extremely favorable pricing from its suppliers.  If those suppliers want to deal with Wal-Mart, they must accept the razor-thin margins the retailer affords them. Any supplier that even thinks about balking need only remember what happened to Rubbermaid Inc.

Back in the early part of the 1990s, in what is now regarded as a classic example of the market power that Wal-Mart was able to amass, consumer-products giant Rubbermaid Inc. found that rising oil prices were forcing up the cost of the ingot-like plastic balls that served as the raw material for its ubiquitous plastic storage tubs. Following what was then standard industry procedure, Rubbermaid tried to pass those higher expenses along to Wal-Mart in the form of higher product prices.

But Wal-Mart, known for its “falling prices” philosophy, not only balked – it fought back. It not only refused to pay the higher prices, it ordered Rubbermaid to find ways to cut the prices of its wares – even in the face of steeply rising raw materials prices.

When Rubbermaid refused, Wal-Mart slashed the amount of shelf space devoted to the Rubbermaid products, and gave the space to a little-known, privately held firm called Sterilite Corp., which had started life as a maker of plastic shoe heels that had the sad propensity to melt. So Sterilite switched to making plastic containers for the home.

Rubbermaid never recovered, and in 1999 it was forced to merge with Newell Inc. to form Newell Rubbermaid Inc. (NYSE: NWL). Rubbermaid remains the No. 1 maker of plastic storage containers. But after having come out of almost nowhere, Sterilite is today No. 2.

So in addition to being the “channel commander” – with an ability to dictate terms and prices to suppliers – Wal-Mart’s very lean cost structure and high efficiency from its highly-optimized logistics operation allows it to minimize corporate fat like no other and translate those savings into low pricing for its customers. With Wal-Mart’s sophisticated integrated sourcing-and-distribution system, competing on cost across the board against them is simply not possible for any of its competitors.

And consumers know it.

As Wal-Mart CEO Scott noted in his “Meet the Press” interview, even with gasoline prices way down, consumers are hunkering down.  With unemployment already at 6.7% – and rising fast – the increasing ranks of the unemployed and underemployed alike have already slashed their spending.  And even the folks who have kept their jobs are worried – and are acting accordingly.

The drop in home prices and the evisceration of savings and retirement brought on by a bear market that’s vaporized some $6 trillion in shareholder wealth add the final brush strokes to what was already a very dark economic portrait. Consumer confidence has plunged, and consumers are keeping their wallets in their pockets, partly to boost savings.

It’s an environment in which consumers and companies alike are well advised to employ a defensive mindset every bit as aggressive as the Pittsburgh Steelers. But not Wal-Mart. Instead, the retailing giant has gone on the offensive and is attacking the marketplace with the gusto that’s more like the Drew Brees-led New Orleans Saints.

In short, even though so many consumers are employing a back-to-basics mindset, as CEO Scott described, Wal-Mart isn’t sticking with just food and consumer staples. The chain is taking advantage of troubles in the electronics marketplace with the bankruptcy of Circuit City Stores Inc. (OTC: CCTYQ) and is even making huge inroads in electronics against Best Buy Co. Inc. (BBY).

For example, Wal-Mart is marketing both the Apple Inc. (AAPL) iPhone and Google Inc. (GOOG) G-Phone. It’s also is resorting to proactive advertising of discounts through text messages and other aggressive tactics in order to highlight its discounted merchandise and bring customers to its stores. Needless to say, the strategy is working extremely well.

But what about the change in leadership?  Neither I nor most of the analyst community expected the recent announcement that Scott, 59, would be stepping down as the retail giant’s CEO, effective Feb. 1. But Scott is being succeeded by Michael T. “Mike” Duke, 58, head of the company’s overseas operations, and an executive with substantial global experience. So I am both comforted and optimistic.

I see continuity in Wal-Mart’s core strategies and, if anything, an invigorating shot into Wal-Mart’s overseas strategies.

In fact, this executive shift should play out extremely well for Wal-Mart. With the announcement of its record fourth-quarter sales and earnings back in February, Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (WMT) became the world’s first $100 billion retailer. With an increasing penetration of China, and continued, unabated success even in emerging market countries such as Mexico that have been affected the most by the ongoing U.S. financial-crisis-spawned recession, Wal-Mart is ready to reap the growing benefits of its international foray.

Next year, while the world’s most-advanced economies will be barely growing in the aggregate, emerging economies will post growth of between 3% and 8%, led by China. This should enable the retailer’s overseas sales to climb by as much as 10%, in spite of the global turmoil.

In conclusion, the U.S. recession should translate into increasing market share gains for Wal-Mart here at home, while an increasing penetration into the much-faster-growing economies abroad will help propel both the top and bottom lines for the company. With a Price/Earnings (P/E) ratio of 15 and a very-low EBITDA multiple of only eight, this defensive profit play is poised to continue delivering capital appreciation and market outperformance in the New Year, despite a very difficult backdrop.  Wal-Mart should be a core stock in virtually every portfolio.

ACTION TO TAKE: BUY Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (NYSE: WMT), but do so with some care. Buy half a position today and leave some powder dry to complete the position in the first quarter of the New Year, since volatility will remain with us for some time to come. **

News and Related Story Links:

• Money Morning Global Investing Roundups:
  Buy/Sell/Hold ETF EWZ Zooms 42% in Six Days.
• Reuters:
  Wal-Mart CEO sees recession change consumer habits.
• Money Morning News Analysis:
  International Retail Guru Michael Duke to Replace Lee Scott as Wal-Mart CEO.
• Money Morning Aftershock Investing Series:
  Will the Loss of Consumer Credit Serve as the Next Economic Aftershock to Further Fuel the Financial Crisis?
• Money Morning News Analysis:
  With Many Hits, Some Misses, Wal-Mart Searches for Success in the Global Economy.
• Apple.com:
  Apple iPhone.
• Android Community:
  Google Phone.
• Money Morning Outlook 2009 Series:
  Some Latin American Markets Show Profit Potential in the New Year, While Others Pose Risk.

** Special Note of Disclosure: Horacio Marquez holds no interest in Wal-Mart Co. Inc.

There is no doubt that the global economic environment presents a very bleak outlook.  The National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) last week announced that the U.S. economy has been in a recession since last December – a situation that appears to be getting worse, given that the economy lost half a million jobs lost half a million jobs in November. Interestingly, the market traded up both those announcements.
On Nov. 24, Hewlett-Packard Co. (NYSE: HPQ) reported a quarterly profit of $1.03 a share, exceeding analysts’ estimates of $1.01 a share.  Hewlett-Packard almost doubled its revenue from technology services from last year because of its acquisition of Electronic Data Systems Corp. earlier this year, and a 21% increase in quarterly sales of notebook computers and a 10% rise in personal computer sales.

You read that right: Hewlett-Packard recorded a big jump in three key business areas – during a recession.

These impressive results are due to Hewlett-Packard outperforming its peers with superior products and exemplary execution. What’s more, Hewlett-Packard has been an early adopter of some of the fastest chips for servers – the “Shanghai” chip by Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD), which just leapfrogged the offerings of arch-rival Intel Corp. (INTC) in terms of both speed and market share.

In its core printer and server business units, Hewlett-Packard actually experienced a slight contraction in businesses.

The key to Hewlett-Packard’s better-than-expected results is the large proportion of recurring services and supplies, which are much less vulnerable to a contraction in economic activities.  You need to keep your systems running with the up-to-date software and maintenance services and you need to keep buying ink for your printers.  This recurrent income smoothes out earnings and is a blessing for companies like Hewlett-Packard, International Business Machines Corp. (IBM), Automatic Data Processing (ADP) and others, which benefit greatly from such sustainable income streams.

In this light, Hewlett-Packard’s management not only blew away its earnings estimates, but also came out with a much stronger-than-expected guidance.  Well, the market was overbought that day and the stock sold off the next day.  The word dropped by some was that the analyst community did not believe Hewlett-Packard’s rosy outlook.  But the reality is that the market had anticipated Hewlett-Packard’s strong results and bid up Hewlett-Packard’s stock ahead of the announcement.

So far so good, but what about the future?  Mark V. Hurd, Hewlett-Packard’s president, expects to be able to cut $1 billion in expenses in 2009 from redundancies from the EDS acquisition that he will be eliminating.  And Hurd has shown a strong track record in this sense since he took the helm in 2005. 

So the question is how much faster Hurd can cut costs to compensate for the reduction in economic activity, in case things keep getting worse as they very likely will in the first quarter of 2009.  But there is some hope that the incoming Barack Obama Administration will add to the aggressive monetary and fiscal stimulus already approved and only partially implemented by the current administration.  In any case its positive effects are only starting to be seen.

And the other question is how much downside has the market already discounted in Hewlett-Packard’s shares, which are down 38% from their 52-week high of $52.90. Well, with a trailing Price/Earnings (P/E) ratio of only 10.0 and a P/E to Growth Rate (PEG) ratio of 0.7 for this very resilient profit stream in a company characterized for flawless execution, Hewlett-Packard is a steal.  This can also be said for most of the market, which is in panic state, taking refuge in government bonds yielding almost zero. 

This last phenomenon has been referred to by Mohamed El Arian, co-Chief Executive Officer of PIMCO as a U.S. Treasury bubble. And in times of panic, it is a good idea to buy.  So I will unequivocally recommend buying HPQ in increments.  I would buy one-fifth of my position on weak days prior to year end – accumulating half our position – leaving the last half for purchase in the first quarter of 2009.

 ACTION TO TAKE: BUY Hewlett-Packard Co. (NYSE: HPQ), but do so with some care. Purchase two-thirds of your position between now and year-end, and the final third during the first quarter of the New Year. **

Editor’s Note: Horacio Marquez was working as a vice president of the Merrill Lynch Emerging Markets Fixed Income Group in 1994 when he correctly predicted that both Argentina and Mexico were headed for currency crises – cementing his reputation as an expert on both the emerging markets and on the nuances of global finance. Now Marquez brings that expertise to you with his newly created "Shadow Stock Trader" specialized trading service. To find out how to subscribe, please click here. "Buy, Sell or Hold" is a new Money Morning feature that has most recently analyzed such companies as Bank of America Corp. (NYSE: BAC), Suncor Energy Inc. (NYSE: SU), Potash Corp. (NYSE: POT), Garmin Ltd. (Nasdaq: GRMN), Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (NYSE: BRK.A, BRK.B), Cisco Systems Inc. (Nasdaq: CS), Chevron Corp. (NYSE: CVX), Valero Energy Corp. (NYSE: VLO), General Electric Co. (NYSE: GE), and steelmaker Nucor Corp. (NYSE: NUE).]
** Special Note of Disclosure: Horacio Marquez holds no interest in Hewlett-Packard Co.

News and Related Story Links:

• Money Morning:
  Obama Unveils Economic Team, Plans 2009 Stimulus Package.

With America’s “Big Three” automakers all due to submit turnaround plans to Congress today (Tuesday) – a requirement if General Motor Corp. (GM), Ford Motor Co. (F), and Chrysler Corp., are to receive $25 billion in government loans – I couldn’t help but recall the moment eight years ago when I realized the U.S. auto industry was skidding toward a financial collapse.

I’ve been thinking about that market call of mine a lot of late, particularly after recently reading that JP Morgan Chase & Co. (JPM) credit analysts had rated GM’s distressed debt as a “Buy,” noting that the company was likely going to survive.

It was October 2000, and I’d just joined a multi-billion-dollar asset management organization as its head of credit. While most of my experience before this was with very risky and fast-moving emerging markets, this new position was focused on the top tier of the investment market, since the group I was joining had a marked risk aversion and was managed with capital preservation as its main mantra.

“Piece of cake,” I thought to myself.  After decades of deciphering volatile emerging economies, I had “graduated” to analyzing strong companies in the top economies in the world. These credits were all rated “A” or better. And the proportion of our holdings that were not rated “AAA” was a rounding error.

WorldCom Inc., Enron Corp., and the U.S. “Big Three” carmakers were among the companies I had to analyze, as well as some 208 structured investment vehicles (SIVs).  The curious asymmetry was that while companies like Enron and WorldCom were rated “A,” and had tremendous – yet officially unrecognized – risks to the downside, their commercial paper was rated “A1” and “P1,” the highest possible rating offered by leading rating agencies.

The SIVs, Enron, and WorldCom did not resist even minimal analysis. I axed the two companies, as well as the SIVs that did not offer a full guarantee from the sponsor. [For additional insights on the SIV debacle, check out Part I of the Money Morning special investment research report, The Dumbest Money in the World. The report is free of charge.]

So I ended up starting with the corporate bonds, by first addressing the largest exposures we had.

A Debt-Focused Tour of America’s “Big Three”

Since the three U.S. carmakers – all carrying “A” ratings on their bonds, and “A1” to “P1” on their commercial paper – accounted for about one-third of all investment-grade paper outstanding, I analyzed them first.  I had a large advantage over my peers in the investment grade industry:  Since emerging-market credits – both sovereign and corporate – were overwhelmingly in junk bond territory, I had seen over years how late the rating agencies were in adjusting their ratings to the credit reality of the issuers in general. 

The foregone conclusion in “junk land” was that the rating agencies provided lagging indicators of credit risk.  In addition, having analyzed credits in Argentina with 1% inflation a day, as well as massive, surprising devaluations, I knew how distorted financial statements can become and was highly skeptical.  

When I downloaded the balance sheet for General Motor back in the third quarter of 2000, I was stunned. Something just wasn’t right. These numbers I saw just couldn’t be correct.

 “Surely I had made a mistake and downloaded the wrong one,” I thought to myself.  “I must have downloaded a subsidiary’s or maybe the parent company’s unconsolidated balance sheet.”

I checked and re-checked.  I had the right one.  The company’s equity-to-assets ratio was only about 2%  – and that was before counting its under-funded pension liabilities.  With that deficit factored in, GM had negative equity.

In other words, the leading U.S. carmaker was technically bankrupt.

Now, I wouldn’t even lend money to a bank with such high leverage. And a bank diversifies the risks in its lending portfolio, is highly regulated, and secures a huge amount of its lending with hard assets. 

But an industrial company sitting on hoards of car inventories and loans backed by used cars … that nobody particularly liked?  Not a chance.

With such low levels of equity, the ability of a company to withstand an economic shock is almost nonexistent.  So, I searched around for any possible redeeming qualities that I could be missing.  But after a very thorough review, I concluded that we had to drop all three of the U.S. carmakers – GM, Ford and Chrysler.

When I brought my decision to the firm’s chief investment officer, a portfolio manager with years of experience in the investment-grade debt market, and a person I’d known back during my days at Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. (MER), he was unnerved.  He trusted my judgment, but he, like the rest of the market, was confident that each of the Big Three was “too big to fail.” 

Nevertheless, with our firm’s overarching commitment to capital preservation, we negotiated a fast wind-down of exposures: We would sell all the long-term exposure immediately, freeze any new exposure and we would not roll over the commercial paper – most of which was due to mature within a couple of weeks.  In this way, all of our Big Three exposure would be gone within weeks, and we were confident each of the three had the cash and near-term liquidity to pay us back.

A couple of weeks later, at a charity function, I happened to bump into the former head of one of the premier asset management organizations in the world.  In a short conversation, I mentioned my private concerns. The gentleman draped an arm across my shoulders and essentially told me that “the Big Three are not going to go bankrupt.”  That was it.  Another too-big-to-fail advocate.

The Too-Big-to-Fail Myth

Evidently, there were reasons beyond mere creditworthiness that led this very smart man – and others – to keep ignoring the fact that the automotive emperor had no clothes.  The pre-eminent one is the “too-big-to-fail argument,” and those who make that argument are trafficking in the moral hazard trade.  Yet, even today, GM on its website ardently contends that it is indispensable to the U.S. economy, hoping to persuade U.S. taxpayers to throw good money after bad.

(We’ll find out how Congress feels about that argument after GM, Ford and Chrysler submit their plans today. It certainly won’t help that today we’ll also likely find that November sales from the major automakers show only a limited bounce from 25-year lows.)

The other argument is that the auto industry is “strategic” to national interests.  That is to say: How can a country defend itself if it produces no vehicles?  And what about advanced transportation and classified technologies research?

But that argument does not hold up under scrutiny, either.

As eminent economist Martin Feldstein has reminded us, giving the Big Three $25 billion will last less than a year. The reason: They are burning through about $7 billion each a quarter.

Clearly, forcing the three carmakers to restructure will be in everybody’s interest. 

Through bankruptcy – with some, minimal government intervention – we should force the inevitable restructuring to take place. As a result of that restructuring, worker compensation levels will be brought into line, employee and retiree health benefits will be reduced to lower-but-still-competitive levels, any dividends will be eliminated, and executive payouts and perks will be capped. How far must this go?

That’s easy – keep cutting until the companies are restored to health and, most important of all, to a state of long-term viability.

This does not mean that the Big Three will disappear. What will disappear is corporate waste. The companies will restructure/continuing profitable activities and liberating resources from unprofitable ones to expand future development.  This has been done successfully – and en masse – in many “strategic” industries, such as the steel business in the United States, and telephony, utilities, energy, aerospace, and many others that were restructured in the 1990s in Argentina, Brazil and South Korea.

There is no reason why each of the Big Three – each currently the laughingstock of the global auto industry – should not regain their leadership positions, as measured by profitability and technological prowess. In this way, GM, Ford or Chrysler – or even all three – can create good, secure jobs and contribute to the U.S. economy, rather than detracting from it.

To be fair to GM and the others, they all have attempted to restructure. They’ve secured agreements with the United Auto Workers union that were designed to control costs. And they’ve tried to launch newer, better vehicles.  But those agreements are too little/too late, and the sands have run out of the hourglass.

Union leaders from GM, Ford and Chrysler have now scheduled an emergency session for tomorrow (Wednesday) in Detroit as the companies plan to seek concessions from the United Auto Workers to help land those win $25 billion in government loans, Bloomberg News reported yesterday (Monday). Participants will be asked to reopen a 2007 labor agreement to consider concessions. GM, which has said it may run out of cash to meet its obligations, wants to stop paying union workers when plants are closed and there isn’t any other work for them to do. Now Ford and Chrysler are expected to ask the UAW for similar concessions as part of their bid for the government aid package, Bloomberg said.

All three of the American carmakers were technically bankrupt since at least the time of my first analysis near the end of 2000, and the union agreements still did not bring compensation down to levels comparable to that of their competitors. Now the U.S. automakers are on life support.  There is no time left for gradualism.  They missed that window long ago and the costs imposed on all U.S. taxpayers figure to be huge.

The current predicament in which GM, Ford and Chrysler now find themselves is not only their own fault, as we’ve now already been subsidizing the unions for far too long.

Are Unions to Blame?

One of the biggest reasons Detroit’s Big Three have run out of capital is the extraordinary compensation that has been paid out to unionized workers in the United States.

Even in the last reported quarter, when the economies of Europe and Asia had slowed dramatically, GM was almost breakeven in those two regions and actually had 10% profit growth in Latin America, Africa and the Middle East, where GM also has unionized work forces. But the company is losing money in the United States.

That’s because the GM pays about $75 per hour – $156,000 a year – to its assembly line employees.

And because of that, the Big Three are lagging far behind in technology investment. That has not only damaged the auto-related technology industry, but has decreased productivity and innovation, delaying the shift to more fuel-efficient technologies.  And because they have jointly held the market leadership, they set prices high, allowing foreign competitors to undercut them.

These phenomena have increased the costs of transportation for all Americans for decades.  Americans have overwhelmingly voted with their dollars by buying foreign brands, which has contributed to our growing trade deficit.

Ultimately, inefficiencies in the auto industry have imposed huge costs on the rest of the economy, putting the Big Three at a competitive disadvantage that has hurt profits, cost the economy jobs, and opened the door to foreign companies to export U.S. dollars back to Germany and Japan (and now South Korea and China).

GM lost $21.3 billion in the third quarter and burned through about $7 billion in cash.  It has only about $16 billion in cash left, and already its liabilities are $60 billion larger than its assets, which means that GM has negative equity. 

And the current quarter will be worse.

The bottom line is that GM is essentially bankrupt – and has been for years.

At this point, GM should – like so many companies before – have to restructure its costs to a point that allows it to be competitive before receiving a single taxpayer dollar.  Otherwise, we are just throwing good money after bad and it won’t be long before GM comes crawling back for more.

I just hope that the politicians and government officials in Washington are wise and determined enough to control the situation, and force the bitter medicine down the company’s throat.

To Buy, or Not to Buy

In this environment of high uncertainty, I would not go near any GM securities. 

However, highly sophisticated players may consider making a very small bet, in one of several ways. With GM’s bonds and credit default swaps trading at near-bankruptcy levels (15 cents on the dollar), it may be attractive (albeit highly speculative) to buy GM’s bonds, in the hope of converting these debt securities into the debt-and-equity of a newly restructured General Motors. Over the course of a couple of years, this could turn out to be extremely profitable, but only if GM’s work-force wage-and-benefits costs are brought into line with the company’s global rivals – and if the U.S. economy recovers. Among the many financial scenarios under review, GM’s board of directors is reportedly considering an option that would grant current bondholders equity in a restructured company in return for maneuvering room, according to media reports.

Reuters reported that GM’s bonds fell nearly 12% early yesterday (Monday) as investors waited for the automaker to submit a new turnaround plan that might actually have a chance of winning lawmaker support. GM’s 7.125% notes due in 2013 fell to 23 cents on the dollar, down from 26 cents on Friday, according to MarketAxess. As we noted earlier, GM is due to submit that plan by today.


When JP Morgan’s credit analysts made their market call last month, GM’s benchmark 8.375% bond due 2033 has dropped to 25.75 cents on the dollar, which was down from 36.5 cents at the end of October, MarketAxess said. The bonds had traded at more than 80 cents on the dollar at the beginning of the year and currently yield 32.5%.

In the case of selling credit default swaps, an investor would get paid some 80% to 85% of the value they are “insuring” up front. If GM gets bailed out, which is an increasingly likely scenario, that investor would keep the full premium and walk away.  And in the case of default, that investor would have to pay the buyer 100%, therefore losing some 15% to 20% after the default, but getting the bonds he is insuring in exchange for that loss.  We would then take the bonds into the restructuring as noted above.

I would not buy the actual GM shares, even though I have friends in high places in finance that still believe in the too-big-to-fail theory. My concern with GM’s stock is that there would be a very strong chance the company’s equity gets totally wiped out in a bankruptcy, or at least heavily diluted as a result of any government infusion the company receives.

GM’s shares closed yesterday at $4.59 each, down 65 cents each, or 12.4%. They have traded as high as $29.95 in the past 12 months. The company right now has a market value of only $2.8 billion.

[Editor's Note: Horacio Marquez was working as a vice president of the Merrill Lynch Emerging Markets Fixed Income Group in 1994 when he correctly predicted that both Argentina and Mexico were headed for currency crises - cementing his reputation as an expert on both the emerging markets and on the nuances of global finance. Now Marquez brings that expertise to you with his newly created "Money Moves Alert” service. To find out more, please click here. "Buy, Sell or Hold" is a new Money Morning feature that has most recently analyzed such companies as PepsiCo Inc. (NYSE: PEP), Bank of America Corp. (NYSE: BAC), Suncor Energy Inc. (NYSE: SU), Potash Corp. (NYSE: POT), Garmin Ltd. (Nasdaq: GRMN), Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (NYSE: BRK.A, BRK.B), Cisco Systems Inc. (Nasdaq: CS), Chevron Corp. (NYSE: CVX), Valero Energy Corp. (NYSE: VLO), General Electric Co. (NYSE: GE), and steelmaker Nucor Corp. (NYSE: NUE). One recent recommendation, the iShares MSCI Brazil Index (EWZ), an exchange-traded fund (ETF) that invests in Brazil, actually rose 42% in the first six days after Marquez rated it as a “Buy.”]

News and Related Story Links:

• Money Morning:
  GM, Ford, and Chrysler Chiefs Push for Action in Washington as Congress Debates Another Bailout.

• Reuters:
  GM Likely to Survive, Bonds a "Buy": JPMorgan.

• Money Morning:
  U.S. Automakers, Freddie Mac and Foreign Exporters Next in Line for Bailout Handouts

• Money Morning:
  The Dumbest Money in the World Part One

• Money Morning:
  The Dumbest Money in the World Part Two.

• Money Morning Special Investigation of the U.S. Credit Crisis (Part VI):
  Credit Crisis Update: An Inside Look at the Commercial Paper Debacle.

• Money Morning:
  Sen. Dirksen: Allow Me to Introduce You to Standard & Poor’s.

• Wikipedia:
  Negative Equity.

• Reuters:
  GM’s bonds fall ahead of expected restructuring plan.

• Bloomberg News:
  GM, Ford, Chrysler UAW Leaders Call Emergency Meeting.

• TheStreet.com:
  GM Readies Viability Plan: Report.

• Money Morning:
  Buy, Sell or Hold: iShares MSCI Brazil Index.

When – on August 22, 1851 – schooner-yacht America defeated 15 other yachts representing the Royal Yacht Squadron, racing around the Isle of Wight in England to win the renamed “America’s Cup,” Queen Victoria asked who was second.  The famous answer was: "Ah, Your Majesty, there is no second."

Similarly, in the search-engine category, Google Inc. (Nasdaq: GOOG), has run away with the trophy, leaving its competitors so far behind that they’re actually still over the horizon. Today, Google controls at least 60% of the search activity on the Internet, eclipsing all its rivals, most notably, Yahoo! Inc. (Nasdaq: YHOO), whose market share hovers around 20%.

And in an even more important landmark: Since the middle of the year, Google has finally been topping content-heavy Yahoo.

In fact, October traffic data released by comScore Inc. (Nasdaq: SCOR) showed Google growing to 147 million visitors, an advance of 12%, over the past year, versus only 6% growth for Yahoo. Google, with the increased ability to meet the new information needs of the public, is clearly gaining momentum.  Can you live through a single day without Googling? Probably not.

Also, this search engine dominance allowed Google to veer away from establishing an ad search partnership with Yahoo, which would have posed a significant regulatory problem, creating a controversial and administrative morass that would have diverted critical time and resources away from its mission.

Google’s success increasingly extends to new initiatives: Cloud computing, Internet telephony, search-sensitive ads just launched in the Google-owned You Tube LLC, and the recently-launched GPhone.  These are all extension strategies of its dominant presence in search on the Web, and Google is now pushing them aggressively to increase its ability to monetize them. For example, Google is now offering voice-recognition Web search in the IPhone.  And this soon will come to the GPhone.  So the Internet-search war has been quickly expanded.

Economic Backdrop

In the financial systems of the developed world, as well as in some unprepared emerging markets, valuations have collapsed.  What’s more, given the news, we expect no change anytime soon, for it will take months for the more than $3.5 trillion in global stimulus packages to take effect. In the meantime, job losses will keep escalating, especially in the United States, since unemployment typically peaks after a recession ends. It is a lagging indicator.  The financial markets typically discount the situation some six months ahead of an actual uptick in the economy.

And in this situation, where many leveraged institutional players were forced to dump the good with the bad, tons of apparently cheap stocks have hit the radar screens of value players have entered the radar screens of value players.  And Google is one of them.

Google, with a forward Price/Earnings (P/E) ratio of only 14.0 and a Price/Earnings to Growth Rate (PEG) ratio of less than one 1.0, is a one-time momentum play that is now a value play. And since it traded at $700 a share a year ago, it appears to be very cheap, and to have most of next year’s economic slowdown already built into its current price. Indeed, it’s quite possible that even if the economy does slow, some or all of Google’s new growth initiatives could generate a revenue or profit surprise.

The shares closed Friday at $262.43.

The company recently beat Wall Street expectations quite handily, with profits for the quarter ended in September rising to $1.35 billion, or $4.24 a share, from $1.07 billion, or $3.38 a share. 

Revenue rose 31% from last year, even though it was up only 3% sequentially.

Google is well-managed, is very resourceful and has plenty of maneuvering room. Its managers wisely started controlling costs by reining in expense growth, long the focus of criticism by Wall Street. And it has accelerated the monetization of some of the new initiatives. For instance, even though the economy’s slowdown has weakened consumer spending, competition by advertisers for performance-driven pricing is going to drive pricing-per-click up in the year-end shopping season.

In addition, Google’s vast dominance in its home U.S. market still leaves it room to grow in the rest of the world, including such promising markets as Japan and China, where it lags the market leaders. And the name of the game for global growth next year will be the emerging markets. These economies, even though they have been hit by the global financial crisis, have recently implemented strong stimulus plans, which will create growth opportunities as they take hold.

Google’s afore-mentioned “cloud computing” initiative, which involves having users utilize software and computing resources located in Google’s servers for a fee, as opposed as having to buy and manage their own software, is no longer laughed at: Google has recently achieved gains over Microsoft Corp. (Nasdaq: MSFT), with important enterprise clients adopting some of Google’s e-mail services, and dropping Microsoft Exchange and Outlook.

In an economy where cost-cutting is increasingly important, the opportunity to adopt Google’s lower-priced initiatives becomes increasingly attractive to an ever-growing population of small and medium-sized companies that are looking to control expenses.

Microsoft has responded by launching its own cloud computing initiative, Azure, in order to hedge its bets.  But the tide is turning away from boxed software towards cloud computing, meaning Google is clearly ahead once more.

Finally, Google’s GPhone is 10% cheaper than the rivaling Apple Inc.’s (Nasdaq: AAPL) iPhone, sports an “open architecture,” and emphasizes fast browsing, G-Mail and Google Calendar. This allows for third-party developers to create all sorts of software to run in it.  Web services and search are integrated across applications, allowing users to jump directly from applications into Web search or Google maps. Another advantage is the data plan, starting at only $25 a month.  The GPhone still has some kinks to work out, but in a few months it should be a serious play in the market. [For a view of the Apple iPhone, check out a recent “Buy, Sell or Hold” feature on Apple from Money Morning.]

The bottom line: The temporary slowdown in the rate of ad revenue growth gives us the perfect opportunity to establish a position in Google, at a very attractive valuation, and before the $3.5 trillion worth of global stimulus money starts to work its economic magic. Could Google’s shares tumble more? Sure. Some extreme bears consider $200 as a possibility.  I seriously doubt it could get there.  But we are not going to take the risk.  Determine how much of a position you want to establish. I would buy one-third of the position initially, and then add in on down days, until two-thirds of the position is established by the end of the year. Keep that remaining third ready, just in case we get the low-probability occurrence of seeing it down to $200.

Action to Take: Buy Google Inc. (Nasdaq: GOOG). Buy one third of your position initially, and then add to it on down days, until you complete two thirds of your position by year-end.  Keep the remaining third ready, just in case you get the admitted low-probability occurrence of seeing it down to, or below, the $200-a-share price level. **

[Editor's Note: Horacio Marquez was working as a vice president of the Merrill Lynch Emerging Markets Fixed Income Group in 1994 when he correctly predicted that both Argentina and Mexico were headed for currency crises - cementing his reputation as an expert on both the emerging markets and on the nuances of global finance. Now Marquez brings that expertise to you with his newly created "Shadow Stock Trader" specialized trading service. To find out how to subscribe, please click here. "Buy, Sell or Hold" is a new Money Morning feature that has most recently analyzed such companies as Bank of America Corp. (NYSE: BAC), Suncor Energy Inc. (NYSE: SU), Potash Corp. (NYSE: POT), Garmin Ltd. (Nasdaq: GRMN), Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (NYSE: BRK.A, BRK.B), Cisco Systems Inc. (Nasdaq: CS), Chevron Corp. (NYSE: CVX), Valero Energy Corp. (NYSE: VLO), General Electric Co. (NYSE: GE), and steelmaker Nucor Corp. (NYSE: NUE).]

** Special Note of Disclosure: Horacio Marquez holds no interest in Google Inc.

News and Related Story Links:

• Money Morning Buy, Sell or Hold Feature:
  Buy, Sell or Hold: Apple Inc.

• Wikipedia:
  Cloud Computing.

• Wikipedia:
  Internet telephony.

• Wikipedia:
  G-Phone.